In some parts of the world, it may appear as if plant-based foods are becoming more common in people’s diets, but in other parts of the world, the consumption of meat and other animal products is increasing. For this reason, there is a growing concern that this trend will not only increase the incidence of noncommunicable chronic diseases but also decrease the sustainability of natural resources. A recent study compared the global impacts of disease-fighting foods and animal foods.
Researchers at the University of Minnesota and Oxford University compared the environmental effects of producing certain nutrient-dense foods associated with lowering disease risks to the environmental effects of certain animal products. The study focused on the production of chicken, dairy products, eggs, fish, legumes, nuts, olive oil, potatoes, red meat (processed and unprocessed), vegetables, and whole-grain and refined-grain cereals and each food’s association with five health outcomes: colon cancer, coronary heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and death.
The study’s findings indicate that among the foods included in the study, vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, and whole grains have fewer detrimental impacts on environmental metrics such as greenhouse gases, land use, and water use. These are also the food groups that previous research indicates provide the most health benefits, including lowering the risk for colon cancer, coronary heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and death. In contrast, unprocessed and processed red meats (i.e., beef, pork, lamb, and goat) are associated with a significant increase in risk for the aforementioned health outcomes (as well as other chronic diseases) and have the greatest negative impact on environmental resources. The study also indicates that chicken, dairy products, eggs, and refined grains had no significant impacts on either disease risk or environmental metrics.
The study’s authors hope the findings influence global populations to make better food choices that improve not only their health outcomes but also the planet.
The dangers of a high-sodium diet have been well documented, but a new technology devised by scientists from Washington State University could help reduce sodium in processed foods while retaining taste and texture.
News about food science research, food companies, food regulations, and consumer/marketplace trends
An overview of the concept of extended reality and its potential applications in the food industry.
This column analyzes the impact of coffee on health.
CPG companies are tackling food insecurity around the globe, tailoring product development initiatives to local market nutrition needs.
News about food science research, food companies, food regulations, and consumer/marketplace trends
Following a long-term diet that’s low in carbohydrates and high in fat and protein from vegetables may reduce the risk of the most common subtype of glaucoma, according to a study published in Eye-Nature.
The U.S. FDA has announced in a letter of enforcement discretion that it does not intend to object to the use of certain qualified health claims regarding consuming certain cranberry products and a reduced risk of recurrent urinary tract infection in healthy women.
According to a group of research, policy, and government experts, the United States needs to strengthen and increase funding for federal nutrition research and improve cross-governmental coordination in order to accelerate discoveries, grow the economy, and—most importantly—improve public health, food/nutrition security, and population resilience.
The 2020 DGAC revisited the topic of added sugars and concluded that a more appropriate target to help mitigate cardiovascular disease and obesity is to lower the number to 6% of energy from added sugars for the 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.
The U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA) has posted the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee’s final scientific report, an objective review of the latest available science on specific nutrition topics.
