Dale Buss

Marks & Spencer's packaged produce

London-based Marks & Spencer Group’s grocery business said it would scrap consumer-facing date labels across 300 of its fruit and vegetable lines. Photo courtesy of Marks & Spencer

Marks & Spencer's packaged produce

London-based Marks & Spencer Group’s grocery business said it would scrap consumer-facing date labels across 300 of its fruit and vegetable lines. Photo courtesy of Marks & Spencer

Consumers share a huge part of the blame for food waste. But in defense of western households, they get very little help from expiration dates on the food they purchase, despite the highly sophisticated supply chains that depend on precision everywhere else.

How are consumers supposed to interpret the date on the package? Consumers’ typical response is to take no chances with disappointing sensory experiences or food poisoning and to jettison foods by, or even before, specified dates, without really understanding whether those items might have much more actual shelf life to go.

In a 2019 survey by Drexel University, 30% of U.S. consumers responded that they would throw away a food that had passed its “best before” date, 50% would discard food by its “use by” date, and 21% would toss food by its “sell by” date. Additionally, more than half of the respondents (58%) would throw away a food that appeared to be edible, but in their assessment “wasn’t worth the risk.” Only 35% of consumers worldwide said they fully understand the differences among date labels, in a recent Capgemini survey.

The problem backs up to retailers, who understand that foods may still be viable, but also know that consumers won’t trust an item on the shelf that’s close to the best-by date. So the store disposes of the foods knowing that they’re edible for at least another few days.

Of course, dating originates with manufacturers, who employ wildly different systems. They typically date products conservatively “because they want to make sure people eat food when it tastes bests,” not just before it’s literally no good, says Emily Broad Leib, founding director at Harvard Law School’s Food Law and Policy Clinic. Such an approach also benefits companies, notes Barbara Bronstein, Houston food rescue organization founder, “since the package dates require shelf rotation, which means more product gets moved—either by selling it, donating it, or tossing it.”

Dates “are tied to food marketing as well,” says Rosemary Trout, a professor of culinary arts and food science at Drexel University. “There’s already a lot of information on the food package, and people are trying to sell these products. All that information is competition for what you put on the label. It’s difficult managing food marketing aspects with what’s helpful to consumers.”

Regulators also are complicit in this problem. “There are no federal laws that require dates or regulate them or restrict what they say,” Leib says. “And the United States is the only country where there is no federal law on date labels.” States have their own regulations, she says, which differ widely.

There are efforts in Congress to fix the situation. One bill, introduced in December 2021 by Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Representatives Chellie Pingree (D-ME) and Dan Newhouse (R-WA), would establish a dual label system reducing the available labeling language to two phrases: one quality date indicator and one discard date indicator. But the federal government at this point is hamstrung, Leib says, by a hot potato mentality among agencies about responsibility for best-by dating, in part because it’s more related to freshness and taste than to foodborne illness and safety.

Potential marketplace solutions include efforts by big retailers and CPG companies. Walmart found that food companies have been using about four dozen various date label schemes and has been pushing suppliers to standardize. And Unilever’s Hellmann’s mayonnaise brand has been explicitly pushing for federal legislation.

New technology attaches QR codes to foods so that consumers can use their mobile phones to get up-to-date information on expiration. There’s also the idea of making the best-by date dynamic or eliminating it altogether.

In the Netherlands, for instance, a major retail chain is testing technology provided by OneThird, a startup that has developed a method to predict the shelf life of produce in real time by combining an optical scanner with a large database and AI algorithms.

“Based on what we’ve measured at the grower or the distribution center, dates will be changed on packaging and will be closer to the real date of spoilage,” explains Marco Snikkers, OneThird’s CEO. “Sometimes they’ll be in the store for a shorter time, but consumers won’t have that negative experience. Sometimes they’ll stay longer in the store, and the retailer doesn’t have to throw them away.”

There’s an effort in the United Kingdom to do away with many dates altogether. London-based Marks & Spencer Group’s grocery business recently said it would scrap consumer-facing date labels across 300 of its fruit and vegetable lines but feature a code that store workers will use to assess when to take products off the shelf.

Food price inflation could give the whole process a nudge. “It’s a great time to say we really don’t want people to waste their food senselessly” because of poor dating information, Leib says. “If we have limited food dollars, we want to use them wisely.”

About the Author

Dale Buss, contributing editor, is a veteran journalist who writes about the food industry from Rochester Hills, Mich. ([email protected]).

Digital Exclusives right arrow

Innovations in Plant-Based Food Safety

Renowned food microbiologist Larry Beuchat talks with contributing editor Jane Caldwell about his body of research.

When Science Follows Technology

While canning is commonplace today, for that generation of food technologists it was a paradigmatic example of the power of science to change food for the better.

SnapDNA is the 2021 IFTNEXT Food Disruptor

SnapDNA, creator of a rapid pathogen detection system for food processing facilities, clinched top honors and a $25,000 prize as the winner of the IFTNEXT Food Disruption Challenge™ Pitch Competition, held Wednesday during the FIRST virtual event.

Food Technology Articles right arrow

The Fruit & Veggie Frenzy

Facts, figures, and trends on consumer consumption of fruit and vegetable CPG products and in restaurants.

Progressive Produce Packaging

This column explores new advances in fresh produce packaging that can help fruit and vegetable processors develop strategies to meet new Food Safety Modernization Act traceability rules under Section 204.

Fermentation’s Superpower Bacteria

A look at applications and potential applications of Bacillus species in fermented foods.

Cool Tips on Freeze/Thaw

This column provides five best practices when addressing freeze/thaw issues during holding and transportation of refrigerated and frozen foods.

Joan Rosen on Audits and Traceability

In this interview, produce safety expert Joan Rosen shares practical insights on the workings of the independent audit and how traceability can enhance its outcome.

Recent Brain Food right arrow

A New Day at the FDA

IFT weighs in on the agency’s future in the wake of the Reagan-Udall Report and FDA Commissioner Califf’s response.

Members Say IFT Offers Everything You Need to Prepare for an Uncertain Future

Learn how IFT boosts connections, efficiencies, and inspiration for its members.

More on the FDA's Food Traceability Final Rule

In a new white paper, our experts examine the FDA’s Food Traceability Final Rule implications—and its novel concepts first proposed by IFT.