!- Google Analytics ->
There are many pressing social, economic, and political issues currently facing Americans. While all these issues deserve attention, their magnitude and diversity can appear overwhelming. It’s never easy to agree on their priority or relevance.
But there is one issue of individual and national importance, core to sustained health and quality of life, that cannot be ignored. Yet, as serious as the issue is, it goes on, unabated. It is so common that it defies attention and management. This crisis cries out for help, yet many appear to respond, “Let it be.”
The COVID-19 virus sparked an acute health crisis, with near miracle accomplishments to develop vaccines in a year’s time, and national resolve to stem its devastation. But America’s existing obesity epidemic-pandemic (O E-P) is an enduring, chronic health crisis. When placed in perspective as to its effects on overall and long-term health and wellness, it is just as devasting as COVID. There is no vaccine.
The average American life expectancy is 79 years, but the average health span is just 63 years. There are many reasons to explain the large gap between a healthy life age and one’s life span. However, lack of weight management, and a state of being obese, are important negative health factors. NHANES data from 2013–2014 indicate 73.7% and 66.9% of all males and females, respectively, were overweight. Additionally, 35% and 40.4% of men and women, respectively, were obese.
The data for children are equally alarming. For children ages two to 19, 17.2% are obese, and 6.0% have extreme obesity. This should be considered a national tragedy and disgrace.
From 1958 to 2015, diagnosed diabetes increased from 0.93% to 7.4% (mainly type 2 diabetes) among Americans. For youths younger than 20 years, in the period 2002–2015, the rate of increase in type 2 diabetes was 4.8% per year. The negative health aspect of type 2 diabetes is expanded with the complication of diabetic nephropathy, kidney disease. About one out of three adults with diabetes has kidney disease.
Directly and indirectly, the food industry is associated with the increasing O E-P. However, this association does not (and should not) imply cause. Too often we want to place blame (i.e., the food industry, snack foods, sugar, etc.) We describe foods as “good or bad,” “nutritious,” “empty calories,” “healthy or unhealthy.” All foods provide varying levels of nutrients and calories. The calories in any one food are not the cause of poor weight management and obesity. The culprit and direct cause is excess calorie consumption over extended periods, irrespective of its food source.
Obesity is a drain on our nation’s vigor and stability. The O E-P needs attention, and IFT needs to stand up and stand out in acknowledging the association of calories and weight gain. The goal is not to blame calories, but to educate how calorie intake can be managed. It should be part of an ongoing education program, in concert with individual companies, community groups, other professional associations, and government agencies. We need to be not only working to promote safe and nutritious foods but to help educate the consumer how calorie restriction can lead to weight management and achieve the health that is so needed and desired today.
The food industry and IFT can and must make a significant contribution. But we must remember, as it has taken three to five decades to reach obesity’s current epidemic-pandemic status, it may take decades of sustained education to help stem its existence.
We have a serious national health problem affecting approximately 75% of all Americans. Yet the O E-P does not lend itself to be a priority issue, demanding a robust, sustained effort to resolve. This lack of unified interest must change. Weight management is a personal issue, but begging for help.
The problem has no champion. We must be that champion.
I urge IFT and its members to become involved in helping to address the O E-P with their creative ideas. Addressing this crisis should explicitly be part of IFT’s vision and mission. Consumers want quality, safe, and nutritious foods, and increasingly want foods to provide for their health. This can only come through education. Become involved. Join the discussion on IFT Connect. Together, we must pledge to cure this personal and collective pandemic. FT
Criticism of processed foods is not new. However, until recently, the finger-pointing was placed squarely on a specific ingredient or nutrient: too much sugar, too much fat, not enough protein.
Soy researcher Mark Messina shares his thoughts on the ways in which the NOVA food classification system paints plant-based meat and dairy alternatives in an unfavorable light.
Speakers at an IFT FIRST multi-session conversation on Tuesday agreed that food scientists have myriad points of influence to drive food and packaging companies’ commitment to sustainability.
Members of IFT’s Food & Nutrition Security Steering Committee highlight some of the challenges and solutions they are exploring in an effort to help achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
An Oxford debate at this year’s IFT FIRST: Annual Event & Expo tackled the health impacts of processed foods, the legitimacy of NOVA food classification, even the language framing the debate itself.
This column offers information about developing sustainable food packaging and food packaging challenges and research opportunities.
This column offers information about how cyber-physical systems can enable the high level of control in food processing automation that will be necessary to meet future needs.
This column offers information about balancing the many competing package design priorities to produce a commercially successful package.
Charcuterie 101: Columnist Wes Schilling details the process for making artisan meat products.
IFT weighs in on the agency’s future in the wake of the Reagan-Udall Report and FDA Commissioner Califf’s response.
Learn how IFT boosts connections, efficiencies, and inspiration for its members.
In a new white paper, our experts examine the FDA’s Food Traceability Final Rule implications—and its novel concepts first proposed by IFT.
IFT’s 2022 Compensation and Career Path Report breaks it down.