Some have said that instituting the principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the workplace, out of compulsion, results in mediocrity, not meritocracy. However, in the absence of diversity and inclusion, it is exceedingly difficult in most human endeavors to proclaim that someone or something merits designation as “the best.” In other words, without diversity and inclusion, meritocracy itself is a meritless myth, and any merit bestowed cannot be deemed equitable.
Science, resplendent in objectivity, is not immune to these pernicious failings when it comes to a lack of DEI principles in our workplaces. Years ago, I was told by my university advisor that my pursuit of a degree in science “was (for an African-American man) socially deviant behavior.” My inclusion in the program challenged the contemporary orthodoxy and the closely guarded cultural hegemony within the sciences. The diversity that I brought to the program was received with a resounding chill.
I know others with similar stories.
I would argue that the presence of differences within a given community (diversity) and the practice of ensuring that people feel a sense of belonging (inclusion), coupled with ensuring that processes and programs are impartial, fair, and provide equal possible outcomes for every individual (equity), is foundational to creating an environment in which meritocracy, not mediocrity, thrives.
Examples abound. For instance, I think most will agree that pugilism is the ultimate measure of meritocracy. Mano y mano, as it were. I don’t think, however, that there are many who subscribe to the notion that Jack Johnson’s inclusion in boxing ushered in an era of mediocrity. Rather, I think, most would agree that his inclusion added diversity to the sport, which may have exposed mediocrity masquerading as the champion.
There are countless stories about American icons that illustrate this point. Despite segregated working conditions at NASA, Katherine Johnson and her team were instrumental in the monumental success of America’s manned space flight program. John Glenn, the celebrated astronaut, did not see their work as mediocre. Rosalind Franklin played a pivotal role in elucidating the structural geometry of DNA. Yet, because of her gender, her brilliant contributions to the field are underreported. In the world of tennis, thanks to Althea Gibson’s courage and masterful game, we now celebrate Venus and Serena—the antithesis of mediocrity. And, during World War II, the U.S. government made Herculean efforts to desegregate and make the armed services more inclusive. Gradually, honors and promotion to positions of leadership were opened to all service members. These actions resulted in exceptional leaders, including General Colin Powell, General Lloyd Austin, and Admiral Linda Fagan. No mediocrity in these ranks.
In a pluralist society, the dominant group frequently seeks to invalidate the contributions of its minorities. In the United States, this is often the case for women, people of color, and other marginalized groups. Advancing the idea that compulsory DEI results in mediocrity is a form of societal invalidation, and its aim is to maintain a sort of cultural hegemony while simultaneously preserving the preferred socioeconomic order among its various subgroups. The easiest means for maintaining and sustaining cultural hegemony is through segregation and exclusion. When the field of participants for any organized activity is the exclusive domain of the dominant group, that group can feign an appearance of superiority.
Historically, efforts to preserve cultural hegemony within the sciences have been highly effective. For decades, women and people of color were summarily excluded from its ranks. The face of science in the United States is still predominantly that of a male person of European descent. Not an Asian, not an African, and certainly not a woman.
Achieving diversity often is a challenge due to trepidation and fear of fraternity with the unknown. Achieving an inclusive organization requires deliberate actions in bringing it to fruition. Diversity and inclusion enable an institution or a society to overcome mediocrity. The true measure of a society’s greatness cannot be ascertained when multitudes of citizens are excluded. Judging meritocracy under conditions of exclusion is the highest form of folly.
The opinions expressed in Dialogue are those of the author.
Leading meat companies are venturing into the plant-based category via investment in startups and by developing their own new alt-meat products and also via the development of hybrid meat/alt-meat offerings.
The success of the plant-based dairy category suggests what’s possible for alt-meat makers if they can overcome current market challenges.
A look at some of the latest trends in controlled environment agriculture cannabis growing.
The aisles of the IFT FIRST expo hall were a jarring contrast to what’s actually happening in grocery store aisles, where the current generation of plant-based meat analogues is experiencing declining sales even as prices are being cut.
A visually oriented overview of spice and seasoning ingredient trends.
A look at trends in the refrigerated foods category.
An infographic describing how consumers use portion control to manage their diet.
A diverse collection of stories around the food industry.
Products tailored for women’s health are on the rise, made by women, for women.
IFT weighs in on the agency’s future in the wake of the Reagan-Udall Report and FDA Commissioner Califf’s response.
Learn how IFT boosts connections, efficiencies, and inspiration for its members.
In a new white paper, our experts examine the FDA’s Food Traceability Final Rule implications—and its novel concepts first proposed by IFT.
IFT’s 2022 Compensation and Career Path Report breaks it down.
