!- Google Analytics ->
Will we be farming small bugs for food on a big scale in the near future?
It’s not that far-fetched: Whole insects and insect meals, oils, and flours already are being produced as new sources of sustainable and affordable nutrition in the industrialized world. The global edible insect market is expected to reach $7.96 billion by 2030 in sales of products like animal feed, pet food, protein bars, protein shakes, bakery items, confectionery, and beverages, according to 2019 data from Meticulous Research. Although bugs are not widely accepted as food in Western societies, entomophagy—the consumption of insects—is common in many tropical zones. In fact, insects are a major protein source in parts of Asia, Oceania, Africa, and Latin America.
These farmed insects can be produced with significantly less land and water and fewer greenhouse gas emissions, and can contribute to reducing food and agricultural wastes, reports the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Insects need only one-third to one-half the amount of land required to produce a similar amount of protein from pigs or chickens, respectively.
“We can produce over 1 million pounds of protein on an acre of land,” says Carrie Kuball, vice president of sales and marketing at EnviroFlight, which markets animal feed ingredients using black soldier flies (BSF). “We can achieve this using vertical trays in an indoor environment. Poultry or hogs can only produce in the hundreds of pounds of protein per acre.”
Not all of the more than 2,000 species of edible insects are suitable for intensive farming. The list of those considered adaptable for commercial rearing includes BSF, common houseflies, house and field crickets, and yellow and lesser mealworms. These species can grow on a variety of substrates at high densities.
Insects provide nutritional benefits that are comparable with those of meat. Protein content, essential amino acids, and unsaturated fatty acids in edible insects are similar to those in red meat, but unlike meat, edible insects are also a source of fiber and vitamin C (Orkusz 2021).
Edible insects contain higher levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids than meat does. These fatty acids can reduce “bad” cholesterol in the blood and lower the risk of heart disease and stroke. Although commercially grown insects are low in omega-3 fatty acids, ingredients such as flaxseed could be added to their diet to improve their omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acid ratios (Ooninex et al. 2020).
Some insect species contain higher amounts of fat, tocopherol, riboflavin, calcium, zinc, copper, and manganese but lower levels of iron, thiamine, and niacin compared with red meat. The nutritional value of insects varies according to species, metamorphic stage, and feeding substrate, so farmed insects must be assayed and evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Edible insects are a potential source of beneficial bioactive or nutraceutical components. In vitro and in vivo animal studies have suggested that consuming edible insects may improve cardiovascular health (Cito et al. 2017), provide antimicrobial peptides to enhance immune function (Tonk and Vilcinskas 2017), and improve metabolic health. Chitin and chitosan, components of adult cricket exoskeletons, have been shown to decrease fat storage in mice fed a high-fat diet (Han et al. 1999).
In human clinical trials, dietary cricket powder had a prebiotic effect by supporting growth of the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis and reducing plasma TNF-α, suggesting that consumption of crickets may improve gut health and reduce inflammation (Stull et al. 2018). Further studies based on clinical trials are needed to assess health outcomes in humans and determine if edible insects meet the criteria of bioactive food ingredients.
Not all insects are safe to eat. Some use toxic chemicals for defense or feed on potentially hazardous substrates, for example, and some adult insect legs have hooks and spikes that can cause physical damage to a diner’s gastrointestinal tract or soft tissues in the mouth.
Insects harvested from the wild may be contaminated with pesticides or have consumed substrate that contains pathogenic microorganisms or prions. Wild insects also are a potential zoonotic risk because they may transfer bacteria, viruses, parasites, and fungi. Insects such as flies are known zoonotic vectors for anthrax, while botulism, parasitosis, and aflatoxin poisoning have been documented from wild insect consumption (Schabel 2010).
Microorganisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Aspergillus tamarii, and Bacillus cereus have been isolated from both the gut and surface of housefly larvae (Musca domestica) cultured on fresh fish exposed to wild fly populations (Banjo et al. 2005). Spore-forming bacteria and Enterobacter spp. were reported in fresh mealworm larvae in amounts comparable with those found in produce (Klunder et al. 2012). And because nematodes, parasitic amoebae, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium species have been reported in harvested wild insects, farmed edible insects should be considered possible vectors for these parasites too.
Another safety concern involves intrinsic proteins causing allergic reactions. Because chitin is present in the exoskeletons of adult insects, allergies similar to those involving shellfish may occur. Also, since they are taxonomically close to house dust mites, edible insects may provoke cross-reactivity with people who are allergic to mites (Lange and Nakamura 2021).
Mycotoxins—fungal metabolites that can cause adverse health effects in humans and animals—have been shown to reduce survival in farmed insects at higher concentrations and affect growth at lower concentrations (Schrogel and Watjen 2019). Despite high levels of mycotoxins in spiked feeding trials with several species of insects, however, no bioaccumulation occurred. But researchers recommend a starvation period of at least 24 hr to remove any lingering mycotoxins in insects’ guts for added safety in industrially farmed insects.
Legislation covering the processing, labeling, and inspection of edible insects varies by country and region. European legislation, for example, considers insects bred to be fed to animals as farmed animals themselves, subject to feed ban rules. This means farmed insects cannot be raised on ruminant proteins, meat-and-bone meal, catering waste, or manure and limits the use of certain waste streams as growth substrate.
In the United States, edible insects are considered a novel food and a food additive. Because novel foods have minimal requirements, some U.S. farmers are reluctant to produce insects without more government guidance. Edible insect products do have label standards in the United States: Both the common and the scientific name must be included on the label, along with a potential shellfish allergy warning.
How will processing affect edible insect nutritional components, digestibility, and safety? Researchers say insects can be regarded as safe, with no more hazards than other animal products, if the insects are properly reared, processed, and stored (Mezes 2018).
EnviroMeal, produced from defatted black soldier flies, is finely ground and high in protein. Photo courtesy of EnviroFlight
With feed costs representing 60%–70% of most animal production systems, insect diets will need to be optimized. Alternative feed substrates should be studied for efficiency, cost savings, waste reduction, and creation of circular economies. EnviroFlight, for example, uses distillers’ grains as a feed substrate for BSF larvae because the company’s plant is based in Kentucky bourbon country, says Kuball.
To increase consumer acceptance, insect meals, flours, and oils could be used as nutritional and functional ingredients in processed formulations. “We use sight and smell to influence consumer perceptions and reduce the ‘ick’ factor,” says Kuball. “Our BSF meal smells like roasted nuts and has a pleasant aroma.”
This approach may reduce consumer rejection and hesitancy caused by the sight of whole insects or larvae. In fact, inclusion of insects in pet food and animal feed is already acceptable to Western consumers. Insect consumption by family pets may increase awareness and open the door for environmentally friendly human food formulations.
Finally, governments need to stay current with innovations in edible insects and provide regulations and guidance that guarantee consumer safety and animal welfare while promoting investment.
Indiana-based startup ZeroCarb Lyfe created a gluten-free, keto-friendly pizza crust.
Ensuring the health of the world’s soil—through regenerative agriculture and other practices—takes center stage in the race to halve global greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050.
Spreading the gospel of culinary nutrition to promote wellness and prevent disease is a passion project for Harvard public health physician David Eisenberg, executive director of the Teaching Kitchen Collaborative.
Whether food packaging is made from fossil fuels, plants, agricultural waste, sand, or any other material, less is more when it comes to delivering more sustainable packaging.
This column reviews USDA FSIS’ proposed comprehensive strategy to control Salmonella in poultry and reduce the number of associated foodborne illness outbreaks, including declaring the pathogen an adulterant in some chicken products.
The aim of the present research was to ascertain the importance of electronic bibliographic database selection and multiple database usage during the information retrieval phase of research in the food sciences. Six commonly recommended databases were compared with respect to overall journal coverage and journal overlap. Databases were also evaluated with respect to coverage of food science‐based journals and the extent of article coverage therein. A case study approach, focused on bile acid/dietary fiber interactions, was used to illustrate the ramifications of database selection/usage when dealing with specific research topics. Databases differed with respect to the breadth of disciplines covered, the total number of journals indexed, the number of food science discipline‐specific journals indexed, and the number of articles included per indexed journal. All of the databases contained citations that were unique to the given database. The data resulting from the case study provide an example of the extent to which relevant information may be missed if pertinent databases are not mined. In the present case, over half of the articles retrieved on the focus research topic were unique to a single database. The combined data from this study point to the importance of thoughtful database selection and multiple database usage when comprehensively assessing knowledge in the food sciences.
The issue of food authenticity has become a concern among religious adherents, particularly Muslims, due to the possible presence of nonhalal ingredients in foods as well as other commercial products. One of the nonhalal ingredients that commonly found in food and pharmaceutical products is gelatin which extracted from porcine source. Bovine and fish gelatin are also becoming the main commercial sources of gelatin. However, unclear information and labeling regarding the actual sources of gelatin in food and pharmaceutical products have become the main concern in halal authenticity issue since porcine consumption is prohibited for Muslims. Hence, numerous analytical methods involving chemical and chemometric analysis have been developed to identify the sources of gelatin. Chemical analysis techniques such as biochemical, chromatography, electrophoretic, and spectroscopic are usually combined with chemometric and mathematical methods such as principal component analysis, cluster, discriminant, and Fourier transform analysis for the gelatin classification. A sample result from Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis, which combines Fourier transform and spectroscopic technique, is included in this paper. This paper presents an overview of chemical and chemometric methods involved in identification of different types of gelatin, which is important for halal authentication purposes.
Interoperability of communication and information technologies within and between businesses operating along supply chains is being pursued and implemented in numerous industries worldwide to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of operations. The desire for greater interoperability is also driven by the need to reduce business risk through more informed management decisions. Interoperability is achieved by the development of a technology architecture that guides the design and implementation of communication systems existing within individual businesses and between businesses comprising the supply chain. Technology architectures are developed through a purposeful dialogue about why the architecture is required, the benefits and opportunities that the architecture offers the industry, and how the architecture will translate into practical results. An assessment of how the finance, travel, and health industries and a sector of the food industry—fresh produce—have implemented interoperability was conducted to identify lessons learned that can aid the development of interoperability in the seafood industry. The findings include identification of the need for strong, effective governance during the establishment and operation of an interoperability initiative to ensure the existence of common protocols and standards. The resulting insights were distilled into a series of principles for enabling syntactic and semantic interoperability in any industry, which we summarize in this article. Categorized as “structural,” “operational,” and “integrative,” the principles describe requirements and solutions that are pivotal to enabling businesses to create and capture value from full chain interoperability. The principles are also fundamental to allowing governments and advocacy groups to use traceability for public good.
Water is a critical resource for growing and processing food. This episode discusses the challenges we face regarding water, and present and future solutions to resolve them.
In this podcast, we discuss food safety culture, including how food safety culture is established, measured, and how they are expected to change in light of ongoing advancements in food science and policy. Our guests include Hugo Gutierrez, Global Food Safety and Quality Officer for Kerry, and Bob Gravani, Professor Emeritus of Food Science and Director Emeritus of the National Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) Program at Cornell University.