Ed Finkel

panelists discuss dispelling misinformation

To convince consumers that food tech innovation initiatives are beneficial, food scientists need to come out from behind their curtain of academic degrees and other professional accomplishments to make a gut-level connection and meet consumers where they are—whether that’s on social media, in chat rooms, or watching television—before trying to reason with them.

That’s according to panelists who took part in a multi-session conversation on the topic of, “How do consumer biases and misinformation affect innovation initiatives?” held July 11 at IFT FIRST, and whose research presentations on a variety of related, specific topics were made available as on-demand sessions prior to the conference.

Food scientists fall into the trap of thinking that if they just educated consumers by presenting additional facts, shoppers would learn to trust those in the profession and readily buy into new innovations despite the fact that they might clutter up package labels with unfamiliar terms, according to Roxi Beck, consumer engagement director at The Center for Food Integrity, whose on-demand presentation covered, “Technology in Our Phones But Not in Our Food? Earning Acceptance in Ag and Food Innovation for a Sustainable Future.”

“Who in the world has more time for more information? How are they able to absorb it and apply it to their life?” said Beck. “You have to be with them—who they are, what they’re feeling, the stresses they have, and start from there. Maybe that’s at a book club; maybe it’s an M&A fight.

“One of the biggest dangers is the word, ‘educate,’” she added. “The heart and the gut are drivers of decision-making for consumers. The brain comes second. It’s very different from the process technical people use. Consumers are irrational. They’re not educated in the same way you are. But they’re making those decisions every day for the people they love.”

Taylor Wallace, principal and CEO of Think Healthy Group LLC and a frequent guest on “The Dr. Oz Show,” said food scientists need to be out there communicating in whatever media are most comfortable for them—and do it in a fun, relatable way. He’s made gummy worms on television and frequently makes joking comparisons likening his professional life that of the fictional movie character Clark Griswold.

“How do I turn this into a fun thing that people watching this show want to look at? You’ve got to appeal to the producer,” said Wallace, whose on-demand presentation covered, “The Impact of Simple Sodium Reduction Strategies on Improving Public Health.” He also writes a blog, and a post he wrote about MSG two years ago still generates eight to 10 messages a week, he said. “Each of us has strengths in communication,” he added.

Tia Rains, vice president of customer engagement and strategic development at Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America Inc., whose on-demand presentation covered “What to Do When People Believe Misinformation,” has used a gut-level connection to convince people that MSG is safe, where logic has sometimes failed.

“You cannot lead with facts when it comes to pretty much anything these days. There’s so much distrust,” she said. “You have to lead with something that’s emotional. We’ve made a lot of ground talking about the racist history of [qualms about] MSG. With the younger generation, that’s very compelling. Then you can tell them the facts. But you have to open the door with something emotional, to get them receptive to new information.”

Food scientists need to figure out where people are and disrupt their food-buying habits in ways they are receptive to being disrupted, said David Lundahl, CEO of InsightsNow, whose on-demand presentation covered, “Overcoming Implicit Biases for a Future of Sustainable Foods.”

But building consumer trust will take time and require those in the industry to think long and hard about not only the right messages, but also the right messengers. “People don’t need more information. They need stories. That’s where the emotional connection is,” said Lundahl.

Making a dent will require an industry-wide coalition, said Rains. “One-off conversations with friends isn’t going to move the needle. We need a comprehensive program,” she said. “If we’re all saying the same thing, they’re going to believe us.”

Such an effort would require a delicate dance among firms who are usually competitors, Beck noted. “You have to do it in a way that’s authentic, where everyone has a voice, and it matches needs of the consuming public,” she said. “We’ve got to cut the jargon. We’ve got to leverage analogies.”

The panel also included Dušan Ristić, research associate and food technology engineer at the German Institute of Food Technologies (DIL), whose on-demand presentation covered, “Biotechnological Farming: Processed or Grown?”

About the Author

Ed Finkel is a freelance journalist based in Evanston, Ill. ([email protected]).

Digital Exclusives right arrow

Is Phenology the Missing Link in a Climate Resilient Food System

The authors describe how phenology—the impact of weather on plant growth cycles—threatens to destabilize the food supply chain and argue that this area of study should be actively considered by food scientists.

Reaching Gen Z On Their Terms

Speaking as a part of a Tuesday Scientific & Technical Forum on consumer mistrust, Center for Food Integrity’s Roxi Beck highlighted some recent research on Gen Z’s purchase behavior.

Keynoter Shares Tools for Cultivating Creativity

Breaking down the barriers to innovation starts with playfulness, says Duncan Wardle.

Why Regenerative Agriculture Matters to Brands

Three passionate advocates for regenerative agriculture laid out the challenges and opportunities it presents in a Monday Business FIRST session.

Food Technology Articles right arrow

Reflections by Richard Waycott and News From Ingredient Companies

News and new product information from food industry suppliers, including a Q&A with Richard Waycott of the Almond Board Of California.

Top 4 Ingredient Trends from IFTs Food Expo

A team of Food Technology editors visited the IFT FIRST Food Expo floor in search of the latest ingredient innovations—and found four top trends that are exciting both industry innovators and consumer palates.

How Safe Are My Plant Proteins

In this column, the author describes the safety, quality, and nutritional challenges of developing novel plant-based protein foods.

Making Sense of Consumer Complexity

Connecting the dots between behavioral research insights and product innovation is a labor of love for Dave Lundahl.

Science Sparked

Abigail Stevenson, Mars chief science officer, says a long-term culture of driving advances in science and technology aims to ignite future-proof innovation for the business, people, pets, and the planet.

Recent Brain Food right arrow

A New Day at the FDA

IFT weighs in on the agency’s future in the wake of the Reagan-Udall Report and FDA Commissioner Califf’s response.

Members Say IFT Offers Everything You Need to Prepare for an Uncertain Future

Learn how IFT boosts connections, efficiencies, and inspiration for its members.

More on the FDA's Food Traceability Final Rule

In a new white paper, our experts examine the FDA’s Food Traceability Final Rule implications—and its novel concepts first proposed by IFT.